The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
ON THE COST OF REPRODUCTION IN LONG-LIVED BIRDS: THE INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABILITY
Abstract
Life history theory suggests that animals should balance their current investment in young against their chances to reproduce in the future. One fundamental prediction from the theory is that long-lived species should be restrictive in any increase of their current investment. It has been suggested that long-lived species, therefore, have evolved a fixed level of investment in young in order to maximize their own adult survival. However, recent experimental studies have shown that long-lived seabirds have a flexible reproductive performance and adjust their effort in raising young, both according to their own body condition and to the need of the chicks. In this study, we present a model of the optimal balance between reproductive effort and adult survival for long-lived birds breeding in a stochastic environment. During poor breeding conditions, maximum fitness is achieved either by not breeding at all, or by abandoning the brood. Beyond a certain threshold in breeding conditions, there is a steep increase in reproductive effort and an equally steep decrease in adult survival. The model is applied to two hypothetical long-lived seabirds differing in their potential fecundity. For the genotype with a potentially high fecundity, the model predicts a high threshold for breeding (i.e., breeding conditions need to be very good for the species to attempt breeding); above the threshold, the value of reproduction in terms of fitness is high. For the genotype with potentially low fec…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Long-lived birds can alter their reproductive performance according to their body condition and the needs of their offspring [46], choosing not to breed or to abandon a breeding attempt in order to safeguard their own survival [5].”
From Hand-Rearing, Release and Survival of African Penguin Chicks Abandoned Before Independence by Moulting Parents (2014) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 315
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- 10.2307/3546359 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00236126 · DOI
- T. Anker-Nilssen, 1992 .Food supply as a determinant of reproduction and population development in Norwegian Puffins Fratercula arctica. .Dissertation. University of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway.
- 10.2307/3545327 · DOI
- 10.2307/1521351 · DOI
- 10.1006/anbe.1995.0235 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1974.tb00241.x · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00341328 · DOI
- 10.2307/1941698 · DOI
- 10.2307/5546 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1984.tb02078.x · DOI
- 10.1080/00063655909475939 · DOI
- 10.1086/284824 · DOI
- 10.2307/5734 · DOI
- 10.2307/5172 · DOI
- 10.1007/s002650050320 · DOI
- K. E. Erikstad, J. O. Bustnes, and T. Moum .1993 .Clutch-size determination in precocial birds: a study of the Common Eider., Auk, 110 :623 -628 . · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00328614 · DOI
- 10.2307/3677075 · DOI
- 10.1139/z90-248 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1993.tb02841.x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.210.4474.1148 · DOI
- 10.2307/1938164 · DOI
- 10.2307/3546276 · DOI
- 10.2307/4747 · DOI
- 10.1016/0169-5347(89)90101-8 · DOI
- 10.1006/anbe.1995.0129 · DOI
- 10.2307/4999 · DOI
- 10.1086/284959 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00378945 · DOI
- 10.1086/283179 · DOI
- R. E. Ricklefs, 1987 .Response of adult Leach's Storm-Petrels to increased food demand at the nest., Auk, 104 :750 -756 . · DOI
- R. E. Ricklefs, 1992 .The roles of parent and chick in determining feeding rates in Leach's Storm Petrels., Animal Behaviour, 43 :895 -906 . · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00216594 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00328625 · DOI
- 10.1086/282954 · DOI
- 10.2307/5878 · DOI
- 10.1093/beheco/8.5.465 · DOI
- 10.2307/3545162 · DOI
- 10.1086/282461 · DOI
- 10.1016/0169-5347(92)90143-Y · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Erikstad, K. E., Fauchald, P., Tveraa, T., & Steen, H.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NO)
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1781-1788
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157971432
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Norges Forskningsråd
- Nature
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Keywords
- life history theory, long-lived birds, seabirds, reproductive investment, adult survival, environmental variability, stochastic environments, brood size manipulation, clutch size, fecundity, fitness trade-offs, body condition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ON THE COST OF REPRODUCTION IN LONG-LIVED BIRDS: THE INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABILITY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079%5B1781:otcori%5D2.0.co;2
- The paper
- Erikstad, K. E., Fauchald, P., Tveraa, T., & Steen, H. (1998). ON THE COST OF REPRODUCTION IN LONG-LIVED BIRDS: THE INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABILITY. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079%5B1781%3Aotcori%5D2.0.co%3B2